Effect of the use of a video laryngoscope and bougie on the performance of endotracheal intubation on the ground by novice prehospital caregivers: a randomized simulation study

Objective@#This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of a bougie and glidescope video laryngoscope (GVL) for ground intubation by novice prehospital caregivers. We hypothesized that the intubation outcome using a bougie or GVL was superior to that using the Macintosh laryngoscope (MCL) with a stylet (MCLS) in ground intubation. @*Methods@#A randomized crossover manikin study was conducted. Studied groups were categorized into 4 according to the intubation devices used; MCLS, Macintosh laryngoscope with bougie (MCLB), glidescope video laryngoscope with a stylet (GVLS), and glidescope video laryngoscope with bougie (GVLB). The primary outcome was the total endotracheal intubation time and the secondary outcome was the success rate for endotracheal intubation. @*Results@#The use of a bougie did not cause a significant difference in the intubation time (MCLS vs. MCLB, P=0.213; GVLS vs. GVLB, P=0.633) and the success rate of endotracheal intubation (MCLS vs. MCLB, P>0.990; GVLS vs. GVLB, P=0.077) was compared with the use of a stylet in MCL and GVL. The use of GVL showed a longer endotracheal intubation time compared with MCLS (MCLS vs. GVLS, P<0.001; MCLS vs. GVLB, P<0.001). GVLB showed a decreased success rate of endotracheal intubation compared with the use of MCL (MCLS vs. GVLB, P=0.004; MCLB vs. GVLB, P<0.001). @*Conclusion@#The use of the GVL and a bougie could not affect the performance of endotracheal intubation on the ground. The use of MCL and a stylet for ground intubation could increase the intubation success rate and shorten intubation time compared with the use of a bougie or the use of GVL.

Effect of admission decision by emergency physicians on length of stay of emergency room and prognosis for patients diagnosed with medical diseases

Objective@#Overcrowded emergency departments (ED) are a worldwide problem, which could cause treatment delays and increased mortality of patients. This study aimed at evaluating the effect of admission decisions by emergency physicians without consultation of an internal medicine doctor on the emergency department length of stay (ED LOS) and survival rate of patients diagnosed with medical disease. @*Methods@#The study was a retrospective observational study comparing the ED LOS of patients admitted to the internal medicine (IM) department before and after the policy change regarding admission decisions, implemented in July 2017. During and after the policy change, emergency physicians took decisions on the arrangements and treatment for patients by processing their admission and providing follow-up care without further specialist consultations. The ED LOS and rate of admission to the IM department were compared between the study period (October 2017 to October 2018) and the control period (June 2016 to June 2017). @*Results@#The median ED LOS of patients admitted to the IM department decreased from 164.0 minutes (interquartile range [IQR], 118.0-234.0) in the control period to 114.0 minutes (IQR, 104.0-208.0) in the study period. After propensity score matching, the median ED LOS of patients admitted to the IM department decreased from 187.0 minutes (IQR, 136.0-253.0) in the control period to 144.0 minutes (IQR, 104.0-208.0) in the study period. @*Conclusion@#The admission decisions made by emergency physicians reduced the ED and hospital LOS of patients visiting the ED and diagnosed with medical disease.

Effect of the use of a video laryngoscope and bougie on the performance of endotracheal intubation on the ground by novice prehospital caregivers: a randomized simulation study

Objective@#This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of a bougie and glidescope video laryngoscope (GVL) for ground intubation by novice prehospital caregivers. We hypothesized that the intubation outcome using a bougie or GVL was superior to that using the Macintosh laryngoscope (MCL) with a stylet (MCLS) in ground intubation. @*Methods@#A randomized crossover manikin study was conducted. Studied groups were categorized into 4 according to the intubation devices used; MCLS, Macintosh laryngoscope with bougie (MCLB), glidescope video laryngoscope with a stylet (GVLS), and glidescope video laryngoscope with bougie (GVLB). The primary outcome was the total endotracheal intubation time and the secondary outcome was the success rate for endotracheal intubation. @*Results@#The use of a bougie did not cause a significant difference in the intubation time (MCLS vs. MCLB, P=0.213; GVLS vs. GVLB, P=0.633) and the success rate of endotracheal intubation (MCLS vs. MCLB, P>0.990; GVLS vs. GVLB, P=0.077) was compared with the use of a stylet in MCL and GVL. The use of GVL showed a longer endotracheal intubation time compared with MCLS (MCLS vs. GVLS, P<0.001; MCLS vs. GVLB, P<0.001). GVLB showed a decreased success rate of endotracheal intubation compared with the use of MCL (MCLS vs. GVLB, P=0.004; MCLB vs. GVLB, P<0.001). @*Conclusion@#The use of the GVL and a bougie could not affect the performance of endotracheal intubation on the ground. The use of MCL and a stylet for ground intubation could increase the intubation success rate and shorten intubation time compared with the use of a bougie or the use of GVL.

Effect of admission decision by emergency physicians on length of stay of emergency room and prognosis for patients diagnosed with medical diseases

Objective@#Overcrowded emergency departments (ED) are a worldwide problem, which could cause treatment delays and increased mortality of patients. This study aimed at evaluating the effect of admission decisions by emergency physicians without consultation of an internal medicine doctor on the emergency department length of stay (ED LOS) and survival rate of patients diagnosed with medical disease. @*Methods@#The study was a retrospective observational study comparing the ED LOS of patients admitted to the internal medicine (IM) department before and after the policy change regarding admission decisions, implemented in July 2017. During and after the policy change, emergency physicians took decisions on the arrangements and treatment for patients by processing their admission and providing follow-up care without further specialist consultations. The ED LOS and rate of admission to the IM department were compared between the study period (October 2017 to October 2018) and the control period (June 2016 to June 2017). @*Results@#The median ED LOS of patients admitted to the IM department decreased from 164.0 minutes (interquartile range [IQR], 118.0-234.0) in the control period to 114.0 minutes (IQR, 104.0-208.0) in the study period. After propensity score matching, the median ED LOS of patients admitted to the IM department decreased from 187.0 minutes (IQR, 136.0-253.0) in the control period to 144.0 minutes (IQR, 104.0-208.0) in the study period. @*Conclusion@#The admission decisions made by emergency physicians reduced the ED and hospital LOS of patients visiting the ED and diagnosed with medical disease.